- Solve real problems with our hands-on interface
- Progress from basic puts and calls to advanced strategies

Posted October 30, 2025 at 1:30 pm
We have been noting that the “half-life” of dips has been steadily shrinking. It was once normal for major indices to take occasional days-long breathers even during the most powerful bull runs. Recent events indicate that the relentless urge to buy every dip, no matter how fleeting, has shrunk the length of those respites to mere minutes. The activity of the S&P 500 (SPX) in yesterday afternoon’s and this morning’s sessions offer excellent evidence to bolster that assertion.
The first example occurred after Chair Powell dropped the following bombshell during the start of his press conference:
A further reduction in the policy rate at the December meeting is not a forgone [sic] conclusion—far from it.
Clearly this was not welcome news for those traders who had been expecting a third cut before the end of the year. CME futures were pricing in at least a 92% chance of a December cut to follow the near 100% probability of yesterday’s cut. Those slipped to below 70% after Powell’s comment. The pricing on IBKR ForecastTrader was not quite as extreme, pricing in no less than a 15% chance of a December rate target above 3.625%, but the views now roughly match those shown by the CME.

Source: IBKR ForecastTrader
The reaction in stocks and bonds was swift and sudden. Rates across the Treasury yield curve rose by about 10 basis points and SPX fell by nearly 1% almost immediately. The difference is that bond prices held their losses while stocks quickly recovered from theirs after churning at the lows for just a few minutes. By the end of the day, SPX was almost exactly unchanged.

Source: Interactive Brokers
This was a near exact repeat of the activity at during the September FOMC press conference. We noted that day’s 1% drop and bounce back to near-unchanged levels. The plunge occurred later in that press conference, but the rebound was even more swift.
To be fair, it is not unreasonable to expect air pockets during events like discussions from the Fed Chair. Any comments from a key central banker have the potential to move markets, and thus traders know to be a bit wary while they are occurring. Market makers become more defensive, widening bid/ask spreads and reducing the size of their quotes. That in turn means that a wave of buying or selling has the potential to move markets more than they otherwise might. Hence the big drops and rebounds that occur.
But we also saw something similar just after this morning’s open even as no fresh news was breaking. Investors had no shortage of meaningful data to digest since yesterday’s close. Alphabet’s (GOOG, GOOGL) well-received earnings, Microsoft’s (MSFT) modest disappointment, and the shock of Meta Platforms’ (META) outsize tax bill were being discussed since yesterday afternoon, and overnight we learned that President Trump and Premier Xi reached a deal framework that more or less returned us to the status quo that prevailed before the last escalation of trade and tariff threats. On balance, it was understandable why we might have seen some early profit-taking. But once again, the buyers stepped in quickly and we traded at only modestly lower levels throughout the morning.
This takes us to an extreme question: might we reach a point where the desire to buy every dip erases dips altogether? That sounds ridiculous, but if the half-life of dips continues to shrink, might it reach such a short time interval that any dips are too short to capture? Or alternatively, if dip buying is so foolproof, might some traders and investors take the mindset that why bother selling if you’re going to be proven wrong almost immediately? That sounds downright scary. If everyone is fully invested, who would be left to buy if some investors indeed decided to change course? We’re not at that point – at least not yet – and perish the thought that we actually get there!
For specific platform feedback and suggestions, please submit it directly to our team using these instructions.
If you have an account-specific question or concern, please reach out to Client Services.
We encourage you to look through our FAQs before posting. Your question may already be covered!
The analysis in this material is provided for information only and is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation by IBKR to buy, sell or hold such investments. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Interactive Brokers, its affiliates, or its employees.
La negociacion de futuros, contratos de eventos y contratos de pronóstico no son adecuados para todos los inversores. Antes de operar con estos productos, por favor lea la divulgación de riesgos de la CFTC. Para una copia visitenos aqui <a href="https://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/general/homepage-disclosures.php
Interactive Brokers LLC is a CFTC-registered Futures Commission Merchant and a clearing member and affiliate of ForecastEx LLC (“ForecastEx”). ForecastEx is a CFTC-registered Designated Contract Market and Derivatives Clearing Organization. Interactive Brokers LLC provides access to ForecastEx forecast contracts for eligible customers. Interactive Brokers LLC does not make recommendations with respect to any products available on its platform, including those offered by ForecastEx.
Futures, event contracts and forecast contracts are not suitable for all investors. Before trading these products, please read the CFTC Risk Disclosure. For a copy visit our Warnings and Disclosures Page.
This is commentary on economic, political and/or market conditions within the meaning of CFTC Regulation 1.71, and is not meant provide sufficient information upon which to base a decision to enter into a derivatives transaction.
This has happened before, the S&P went six months without closing below its 50 day average: Sep 2, 2010-Mar 10, 2011; July 25, 2006-Feb 27, 2007. Eventually there will be another BIG dip. The SPY and the QQQ will collapse under their own WEIGHTINGS when the air comes out of the current tech bubble.
In short – the market’s Pavlovian dip-buy instinct is stronger than any macro worry. But the “NSA” regime always ends the same way: everyone’s positioned long, liquidity narrows & some exogenous shock (policy or credit) cracks the reflex.
Never Sell Again (NSA)
Here’s how the “NSA” (Never Sell Again) reflex compares between the 2020–2021 melt-up & the current 2024–2025 cycle (especially QQQ) • 2020-2021 • ~4–5% • 8-10 trading days to recover • Direct retail cash inflows • ZIRP + QE • Explosive, meme-driven retail participation • 25–35 VIX baseline • 2024-2025 (YTD) • ~1.2–2.0% • 1-2 trading days days to recover • Less stimulus, but massive systematic bid (CTAs, vol-targeting, passive) • QT on paper, but net liquidity still expanding via RRP drain & T-bill preference • Concentrated retail participation – mainly in MAG7 & index ETFs • 12–15 VIX baseline — “liquidity illusion” zone In other words, the buyback window has shrunk by 80% • Even minor red days now trigger instant re-risking • Then: retail panic – Reddit “diamond hands” rallies • Now: institutional & algo rebalance – CTAs, dealers & buyback desks neutralize every wobble • Effect: volatility compression + shallow pullbacks = forced upside drift Current NSA Dynamics in QQQ • QQQ’s 5d RSI stays >60 for record stretches (momentum exhaustion without follow-through selling) • Even after big events (FOMC, earnings), pullbacks fail to exceed 2-3% • High correlation with after-hours buy programs – “overnight gap ups” dominate, meaning cash sessions are just marking time until the next grind higher Historically, “NSA” breaks when one or more of, 1. Real yields >2.5% & sticky for weeks 2. Earnings revision cycle turns negative 3. Liquidity event or policy error (surprise QT acceleration or credit event) We’re not there yet – liquidity is still net positive, but positioning is now max long, so marginal upside has diminishing effect
My two cents: Maybe, there is no “Market” – just “Quantitative Easing and Tightenng.”
Philip, what about all the cash still on the sideline?