Asset Classes

Free investment financial education


Multilingual content from IBKR

Close Navigation
Learn more about IBKR accounts
Has Healthy Rotation Become Potentially Toxic?

Has Healthy Rotation Become Potentially Toxic?

Posted July 11, 2024 at 11:15 am
Steve Sosnick
Interactive Brokers

If you look at the reactions of the S&P 500 (SPX) and Nasdaq 100 (NDX), you’d think that today’s benign CPI report was bad for stocks.  In reality, today’s report is helping the vast majority of shares trade higher.  Yet because the “wrong stocks” are heading south, so are the market capitalization-weighted indices that they dominate.  We are getting a dose of the “healthy rotation” that many have hoped for, yet it is impacting key indices nonetheless.

As I type this, around midday, SPX is -0.9% and NDX is -2%.  Ouch.  And this is despite Treasury yields plunging by 10-12 basis points across the curve.   But the Russell 2000 (RTY) is +3%, and advancing stocks are outpacing decliners on the NYSE by a roughly 6:1 ratio and by about 3:1 on Nasdaq. 

Care to guess why the key indices are underperforming?   I’ll bet that many of you know the answer already…

All of the “Great Eight” stocks – the Magnificent Seven plus Broadcom (AVGO) are getting shredded today.  Tesla (TSLA) was the lone stock bucking the trend until we learned that their highly anticipated robotaxi announcement will be delayed from August to October.  Now it is leading the declines.  Other major tech stocks find themselves under pressure, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX) down more than -3% as we see investors pivot from growth to value.  The Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is down nearly -2% while its Value counterpart (VONV) is up nearly +1%. 

Today’s moves are hardly cause for alarm.  Heck, SPX hasn’t even given back all of yesterday’s gains (though NDX is far worse).  But this type of market activity points out in vivid detail why the top-heavy concentration of cap-weighted indices is a source of potential instability for a tech-driven market. 

A prolonged sell-off in some of the biggest names could pressure the main indices that investors watch, even if the majority of stocks remain initially unscathed.  That in turn could cause investors to lighten their exposure to key index-based investments, such as ETFs like SPY and QQQ.  If that occurs, then the selling could swamp the index as a whole, hurting the now laggard value stocks nonetheless.  They would outperform on a relative basis in that scenario but could still get swamped by selling anyway.   Remember, when one buys a “diversified” SPX-linked index fund or ETF, about 35% of it is concentrated in the eight stocks referenced above.  That is far less diversification than many investors realize.

This concern is of greater importance as we enter earnings season.  Delta Airlines (DAL) gave it an auspicious start, but the season “officially” kicks off tomorrow when JPMorgan (JPM), Wells Fargo (WFC), and Citibank (C) report.   The megacaps don’t begin reporting for nearly two weeks, but it doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t consider what could happen if one or more severely underperforms market expectations.  It is not unreasonable to think that those expectations have been pumped sky-high during the recent rally.  This fear was brought home when Micron Technologies (MU) reported otherwise excellent numbers but sank because its raised expectations fell short of the market’s most aggressive hopes.

One day does not a trend make.  But as someone who has been advocating and hoping for a broader market rally and a rotation into value from growth, today’s activity makes me wonder if I should be more careful about what I wish for.

3-Day Chart, SPX (red/green 1-minute candles), NDX (blue line)

3-Day Chart, SPX (red/green 1-minute candles), NDX (blue line)

Join The Conversation

If you have a general question, it may already be covered in our FAQs. If you have an account-specific question or concern, please reach out to Client Services.

7 thoughts on “Has Healthy Rotation Become Potentially Toxic?”

  • Justin Tucker

    Avgo did not decline much and none of the mag 7 hit significant support in my book. The Russell is overbought and i think today is sign of some big investors taking profits.

    • Yvan

      I totally agree. And, Ai and the top seven or so high flyers are maybe forced to take a pause by the big investors, implied profit taking and in short-medium term portfolios diversification, readjustment, recomposition, whatever, name it. But in a long run, these top high end stocks will continue to win the game. The technology is there and will stay.

  • Anonymous

    IF interest rates decline, it’s the Russell 2000 that will find the greatest relief. As it has been lagging significantly for a long period and valuations are much lower, I believe it has the best outlook once rates actually begin declining.

    • Anonymous

      Interesting take. I see bigger companies going even further at an even higher valuation – 2020 gogo years.

  • MonochromicPony

    Played the CPI release via e-mini futures on the indices which is my main trade, day to day. MNQ (micro nasdaq 100) hit my stop early, RTY ran of course, and after MES hit my initial stop I re-entered on a plateau thinking the dip would get bought since vix, yields, bonds, bitcoin, and the dollar were all bullish equities at the time and I hadn’t spotted the rotations gaining momentum yet. And let’s be honest, after that CPI print I was confident the week’s rally would continue.

  • Anonymous

    If you remember the DotCom days Nasdaq rallied much longer than earnings justified it. When growth slowed it was a long way to the bottom. Tight stops and playing reversals saved a lot of traders.

  • Steven E Connell

    On days like today, you find out how well balanced your portfolio is. When your biggest positions decline, do your laggards compensate? And are your laggards up cumulatively over the past 1-2 years? Perhaps the biggest challenge to a growth investor is to find great stocks in sectors that are out of favor. On any given day, half your holdings can be green and half can be red, but almost every stock should be green on a longer term basis unless it is a new entrant.

Leave a Reply

Disclosure: Interactive Brokers

The analysis in this material is provided for information only and is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation by IBKR to buy, sell or hold such investments. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.

The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Interactive Brokers, its affiliates, or its employees.

Disclosure: ETFs

Any discussion or mention of an ETF is not to be construed as recommendation, promotion or solicitation. All investors should review and consider associated investment risks, charges and expenses of the investment company or fund prior to investing. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.

IBKR Campus Newsletters

This website uses cookies to collect usage information in order to offer a better browsing experience. By browsing this site or by clicking on the "ACCEPT COOKIES" button you accept our Cookie Policy.