The article “Are ESG Strategies More Effective for Societal Impact or Performance?” first appeared on Alpha Architect.
In this article, we examine the research addressing the question of to what extent, if any, ESG strategies improve investment performance on a risk-adjusted basis, or if they are more effectively used for the societal impact they potentially have.
- Véronique Le Sourd
- EDHEC-Risk Institute working paper
- A version of this paper can be found here
- Want to read our summaries of academic finance papers? Check out our Academic Research Insight category
What are the Research Questions?
The promoters of ESG Investing often promise outperformance. Despite this, in a survey conducted in 2021 among European investment professionals (Le Sourd and Martellini, 2021), the two main reasons indicated by respondents for incorporating ESG into their investment decisions were to facilitate a positive impact on society (64%) and to reduce long-term risk (61%). About a third (34%) thought that incorporating ESG would serve to enhance portfolio performance. At the same time, more than a third of respondents (35%) said they were willing to accept a lower performance in exchange for a better ESG score.
This article answers the following question:
- Does ESG investing improve risk-adjusted performance?
What are the Academic Insights?
From a theoretical perspective, achieving portfolio optimization using a constrained universe should lead to a lower risk-adjusted performance than when using a non-constrained universe (see Pedersen et al, 2021 and Martellini and Vallée, 2021). From an empirical standpoint, the review of the literature shows contrasting results.
Additionally, Bruno, Esakia and Goltz (2022) find that most of the outperformance of ESG strategies can be explained by their exposure to equity style factors that are mechanically constructed from balance sheet information. This result is robust across different multifactor models. Furthermore, the ESG strategies tested show large sector biases. Removing these biases also removes outperformance.
Finally, ESG can generate positive returns in certain conditions, using ESG momentum. The argument for the outperformance of stocks with high ESG scores is that stock markets underreact to ESG information, and so stocks from firms with a positive ESG impact may be undervalued. The ESG momentum strategy thus consists in overweighting stocks that have improved their ESG rating over recent time periods (Nagy et al., 2016; Bos, 2017; Kaiser and Schaller, 2019).
Why does it matter?
This article is a comprehensive review of the literature on theoretical and empirical evidence for ESG Investing. The author argues that ESG strategies should be valued for the unique benefits that they can provide, such as making a positive impact on the environment or society, as opposed to being promoted on the basis of disputable claims regarding their outperformance potential.
Disclosure: Alpha Architect
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. Our full disclosures are available here. Definitions of common statistics used in our analysis are available here (towards the bottom).
This site provides NO information on our value ETFs or our momentum ETFs. Please refer to this site.
Disclosure: Interactive Brokers
Information posted on IBKR Campus that is provided by third-parties does NOT constitute a recommendation that you should contract for the services of that third party. Third-party participants who contribute to IBKR Campus are independent of Interactive Brokers and Interactive Brokers does not make any representations or warranties concerning the services offered, their past or future performance, or the accuracy of the information provided by the third party. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
This material is from Alpha Architect and is being posted with its permission. The views expressed in this material are solely those of the author and/or Alpha Architect and Interactive Brokers is not endorsing or recommending any investment or trading discussed in the material. This material is not and should not be construed as an offer to buy or sell any security. It should not be construed as research or investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security or commodity. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.