Chart Advisor: Ignore the Narrative; Buy the Trend

Articles From: Investopedia
Website: Investopedia

By C. Theodore Hicks II, CFP®, CKA®, CMT®

1/ Soft Landing Increasingly Likely

2/ But the Dollar Has Helped

3/ Ignore the Narrative, Buy theTrend

4/ Poland > US?

5/ Pinewood Derby

Investopedia is partnering with CMT Association on this newsletter.  The contents of this newsletter are for informational and educational purposes only, however, and do not constitute investing advice. The guest authors, which may sell research to investors, and may trade or hold positions in securities mentioned herein do not represent the views of CMT Association or Investopedia. Please consult a financial advisor for investment recommendations and services.

1/ Soft Landing Increasingly Likely

Broadly speaking, there are two main types of analysts in the financial markets. There are fundamental analysts and technical analysts. (If you are not familiar with the distinctions, you can review the Investopedia article Fundamental vs. Technical Analysis: What’s the Difference?) As CMT Charterholders, my Investment Committee and I definitely have a bias towards technical analysis. However, we do utilize both fundamentals and technicals.

Chart 1 could be considered a bit of both. Here we are displaying the Consumer Price Index since the turn of the century. The red line is the 10-year average which is showing a current reading of 2.7%. The latest CPI data point came in at 3.1%.

If, and this is indeed a big “if”, the CPI stays in this range, we have to give a hat-tip to Chairman Powell and the Gang – sorry, I meant “and the Fed Board of Governors.” (But Chairman Powell and the Gang sounds so much better. It should be the name of a band!)

Joking aside, inflation got way out of control and, for now at least, it seems Chairman Powell has done a fantastic job of bringing inflation back down … and really close to the 10 year average. There are other data points that suggest the battle is not quite won; in other words, there is a very real risk that we could see another spike back up. But, for now, it appears that Chairman Powell has done a good job.

Could he have done better?

Of course. Hopefully, we all are willing to admit that we have room for improvement and we could implement 1% better the next time. But, for now, it appears increasingly likely that Chairman Powell and the Fed may have just engineered a “soft landing”. For now, to him, I would say, “Well done, sir.”

This realization, that the Fed may have very well engineered a “soft landing”, is one of the reasons the U.S. stock market has experienced a very substantial rally since November 1st.

2/ But the Dollar Has Helped

While that is true, Chart 2 shows us that the US dollar has helped.

The top pane of our second chart is the US dollar. The bottom pane is the S&P 500.

Generally speaking, the US stock market is inversely correlated to the US dollar. When the dollar goes up – reference 2022 – the stock market goes down. When the dollar goes down, the stock market goes up. This is not always true, but it is generally true. (This is an example of Intermarket Analysis. What is Intermarket Analysis? Read this Investopedia article.)

Since the start of November, the US dollar has gone down. Meanwhile, since the start of November, the US stock market has gone up. The correlation continues.

What can we glean from this chart?

If you look closely, I’ve added a price measurement to both the dollar index and the S&P 500. For the dollar, it is approximately 2.5% away from the most recent significant low from July 2023. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 is approximately 1.9% away from the all-time high of December 2021.

When a stock or an index reaches a prior low or prior high, that level can act as a resistance or support. While we do not know what will happen when these levels are reached, it is reasonable to expect some degree of a pause or a battle before a breakthrough of that level. But since the DXY is below its 200-day moving average and the S&P 500 is above its 200-day moving average, it is reasonable to expect that the general direction (down for the dollar and up for stocks) would continue.

3/ Ignore the Narrative, Buy the Trend

One of the reasons we have a bias towards technicals over fundamentals is because “price never lies”. (Hat tip to you, Ralph Acampora.) Sometimes, a fundamental analysis might lead us to believe what could happen in the days, months or years ahead. From our point of view, our experience tells us that clients do not care about what might happen. They care about what is happening

Here we are showing two charts. A uranium ETF is on the left. On the right, we have a solar ETF. How many articles have you seen about “green” energy over the last year or two? Now, how many of those articles have mentioned solar energy versus how many have mentioned nuclear energy?

The point that I am trying to make with this side by side comparison is that we have a bias towards technical analysis as technical analysis ignores the narrative. Every CEO wants to create a positive story around his company and why investors should continue to invest in his company. (And, no, I’m not being sexist. I’m simply referring to the traditional definition of “man” in a Proto-Germanic sense; i.e. gender neutral.) However, that narrative is just a story. Sometimes stories are true. Sometimes they are fiction.

But price never lies.

So, we present this side-by-side view of a nuclear ETF and a solar ETF. Most are familiar with the solar story. But would you want to invest in it? Or would you rather invest in the uranium story?

Ignore the narrative and buy the trend.

4/ Poland > US?

To continue the point about ignoring the narrative and just buying the trend, which country was the better place to park your hard earned dollars in 2023, the United States or Poland? 

Without consulting the data, not many would likely guess Poland. But Poland, as measured by EPOL, is up ~47.58% year-to-date while the S&P 500, as measured by SPY, is up “only” 23.94% year-to-date. 

Out of the single-country ETFs that we follow, EPOL is on top for year-to-date performance. Unfortunately, we cannot say that our clients are invested in Poland as we have not seen a clean, low-risk entry. The chart for EPOL is shared simply to help drive home the point that we should ignore the narrative and just buy the trend.

That said, this is also an example of how important it is to know what you are buying. EPOL consists of only 31 stocks. As a result, it is fairly concentrated. But, then again, many folks talk about “the Dow” likely not realizing that the Dow Jones Industrial Average consists of only 30 stocks.

5/ Pinewood Derby

The final chart of the day is WOOD, which is the iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF. I could – and perhaps should – write a dissertation on the fallacy of seeking “diversification”. Ultimately, neither I nor our clients want a “diversified” portfolio. We all want the same thing; a highly correlated portfolio. In a strong, positively trending market, we want our entire portfolio to be participating in that trend. In a weak, or negatively trending market, we want our entire portfolio protected.

However, there is indeed wisdom in seeking some diversification for if you are invested heavily in tech stocks and tech ETFs and that sector shifts out of favor, you are going to be hurt – at least a little. As a result, there is some benefit to having some degree of diversification in your portfolio. WOOD is one option to consider.

Many have written about gold. And indeed, the chart for gold is very interesting; it could easily break out of a multi-year range into new high ground – very exciting. However, when I examine my “commodities” watchlist, I see WOOD is ranked higher than GLD. That piques my curiosity and I check the chart.

When I examine the chart, I see a clear basing formation which I have denoted by adding a light blue rectangle. Recently, WOOD has broken out of that base. While this is not (typically) the type of price action that we would buy, that is a beautiful base and I’ve made a note to debate this ETF with the Investment Committee today.

P.S. The sub-title of this section being labeled “Pinewood Derby” is a nod to our son. His Awana group has again sponsored a “Pinewood Derby” event. Last year, Teddy wanted my help crafting his pinewood block into a Ford Mustang. He won 1st place for design, so that was pretty neat. This year he wants my help turning his block of wood into a Lamborghini Huracan! Wish us luck!

Originally posted 19th December 2023

Join the Discussion

Thank you for engaging with IBKR Campus. If you have a general question, it may already be covered in our FAQs. If you have an account-specific question or concern, please reach out to Client Services.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Disclosure: Investopedia The comments, opinions and analyses expressed herein are for informational purposes only and should not be considered individual investment advice or recommendations to invest in any security or to adopt any investment strategy.  While we believe the information provided herein is reliable, we do not warrant its accuracy or completeness. The views and strategies described on our content may not be suitable for all investors. Because market and economic conditions are subject to rapid change, all comments, opinions and analyses contained within our content are rendered as of the date of the posting and may change without notice. The material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region, market, industry, investment or strategy. This information is intended for US residents only.

Disclosure: Interactive Brokers

Information posted on IBKR Campus that is provided by third-parties does NOT constitute a recommendation that you should contract for the services of that third party. Third-party participants who contribute to IBKR Campus are independent of Interactive Brokers and Interactive Brokers does not make any representations or warranties concerning the services offered, their past or future performance, or the accuracy of the information provided by the third party. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

This material is from Investopedia and is being posted with its permission. The views expressed in this material are solely those of the author and/or Investopedia and Interactive Brokers is not endorsing or recommending any investment or trading discussed in the material. This material is not and should not be construed as an offer to buy or sell any security. It should not be construed as research or investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security or commodity. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.

Disclosure: Forex

There is a substantial risk of loss in foreign exchange trading. The settlement date of foreign exchange trades can vary due to time zone differences and bank holidays. When trading across foreign exchange markets, this may necessitate borrowing funds to settle foreign exchange trades. The interest rate on borrowed funds must be considered when computing the cost of trades across multiple markets.

Disclosure: ETFs

Any discussion or mention of an ETF is not to be construed as recommendation, promotion or solicitation. All investors should review and consider associated investment risks, charges and expenses of the investment company or fund prior to investing. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.